Putting it mildly: Someone Please Help the New York Times With Economics 101

From Caroline Baum at Bloomberg.com:

"In March, every Republican in the House voted against a measure to raise the minimum wage. `When you raise the price of employment, guess what happens? You get less of it,' said Speaker John Boehner in February, espousing a party-line theory that most economists agree has been discredited." -- New York Times editorial, Jan. 2, 2014.

This is one of the more outrageous political statements dressed up as economic theory from the editorial board of the New York Times. They should be ashamed of themselves....

Economists David Neumark and William Wascher reviewed more than 100 studies on the minimum wage in a 2006 paper for the National Bureau of Economic Research: "Minimum Wages and Employment: A Review of Evidence from the New Minimum Wage Research."

Here's a summary of their findings: "The oft-stated assertion that recent research fails to support the traditional view that the minimum wage reduces the employment of low-wage workers is clearly incorrect."

What's more, almost all the papers they reviewed "point to negative employment effects" for the U.S. and many other countries.

The effect is greater for low-skilled workers, whom the minimum wage is designed to help. Overall, the authors found very little evidence of positive effects from raising the minimum wage.

Neumark and Wascher responded to an "unbalanced" Sunday Review article on the effect of the minimum wage in a Dec. 8, 2013, letter to the editor.

And the Washington Post's Fact Checker gave President Barack Obama two Pinocchios for his repeated assertion that "there's no solid evidence that a higher minimum wage costs jobs."

...If you learned anything from your Econ 101 class in college, hopefully it was the law of supply and demand.

Lowering/raising the price of a good or service increases/decreases the quantity demanded. Similarly, producing less/more of something will raise/lower the price.

If you don't believe it, just ask a friend why she didn't buy that pair of boots until it went on sale after Christmas. Or ask a small business owner about what goes into the decision to hire an additional employee.

Isn't it about time opinion writers stopped using economics to justify a moral issue?

Our hearts go out to those who can't earn a decent living, find a job, get laid off for no good reason or find themselves in harm's way.

If we, as a society, want to provide support to those in need, fine. But the [New York Times] does a disservice when it makes wild, unsubstantiated claims about basic principles of economics.
---
Link: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-01-03/someone-please-help-new-york-times-with-econ-101.html